platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later #142258
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@teohhanhui I believe this is applicable to all our Linux targets. |
|
@teohhanhui In particular, please apply it to all tier 2 targets with a Linux kernel version specified. I believe there are a few tier 3 targets where I am less certain of this change, so I think we should hold off on those unless you can identify that they do work with the current kernel. |
And by association |
|
I believe the kernel has only recently dropped support for old, pre-i586 x86, and Itanium, so it should work for everything else. We don't really have any such targets (the i386 of Apple is a misnomer). |
|
There are a few RISCV targets which have gone in and out of functionality recently, despite being newer, for which I am less confident, which is why I suggested skipping tier 3. Anything like this sets off alarm bells:
|
teohhanhui
force-pushed
the
docs/platform-support-linux-kernel-version-or-later
branch
from
a92e01e to
a9401ea
Compare
workingjubilee
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
| @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ target | std | notes | |||
| [`x86_64-linux-android`](platform-support/android.md) | ✓ | 64-bit x86 Android | |||
| [`x86_64-pc-windows-gnullvm`](platform-support/windows-gnullvm.md) | ✓ | 64-bit x86 MinGW (Windows 10+), LLVM ABI | |||
| [`x86_64-unknown-fuchsia`](platform-support/fuchsia.md) | ✓ | 64-bit x86 Fuchsia | |||
| `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnux32` | ✓ | 64-bit Linux (x32 ABI) (kernel 4.15, glibc 2.27) | |||
| `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnux32` | ✓ | 64-bit Linux (x32 ABI) (kernel 4.15+, glibc 2.27) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Anyone using x32 is having a cursed time, but they definitely shouldn't be cursed by being forced to use an even older kernel version than needed.
|
r? @workingjubilee @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
@workingjubilee I'll do some digging on this... |
|
I think the glibc and musl minimum kernel versions may differ for a target in practice |
|
Note that we wish to update the bundled musl soon: #125692 |
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
…inux-kernel-version-or-later, r=workingjubilee platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later To be consistent with notes for other targets... ~~(Only made the change for `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` for now, as that's fairly certain after looking at the `git blame` just to be sure.)~~
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #134442 (Specify the behavior of `file!`) - #134841 (Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute) - #140372 (Exhaustively handle parsed attributes in CheckAttr) - #140766 (Stabilize keylocker) - #141061 (Change __rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable to be a function) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142101 (core::ptr: deduplicate more method docs) - #142176 (tests: Split dont-shuffle-bswaps along opt-levels and arches) - #142258 (platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later) - #142260 (Miri subtree update) - #142262 (Mark `core::slice::memchr` as `#[doc(hidden)]`) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142275 (rustdoc: Refractor `clean_ty_generics`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
…inux-kernel-version-or-later, r=workingjubilee platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later To be consistent with notes for other targets... ~~(Only made the change for `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` for now, as that's fairly certain after looking at the `git blame` just to be sure.)~~
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #134442 (Specify the behavior of `file!`) - #134841 (Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute) - #140372 (Exhaustively handle parsed attributes in CheckAttr) - #140766 (Stabilize keylocker) - #141061 (Change __rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable to be a function) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142101 (core::ptr: deduplicate more method docs) - #142258 (platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later) - #142260 (Miri subtree update) - #142262 (Mark `core::slice::memchr` as `#[doc(hidden)]`) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142275 (rustdoc: Refractor `clean_ty_generics`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
…inux-kernel-version-or-later, r=workingjubilee platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later To be consistent with notes for other targets... ~~(Only made the change for `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` for now, as that's fairly certain after looking at the `git blame` just to be sure.)~~
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #134442 (Specify the behavior of `file!`) - #134841 (Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute) - #140372 (Exhaustively handle parsed attributes in CheckAttr) - #140766 (Stabilize keylocker) - #141642 (Note the version and PR of removed features when using it) - #141909 (Add central execution context to bootstrap) - #141992 (use `#[naked]` for `__rust_probestack`) - #142102 (docs: Small clarification on the usage of read_to_string and read_to_end trait methods) - #142124 (Allow transmute casts in pre-runtime-MIR) - #142240 (deduplicate the rest of AST walker functions) - #142258 (platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later) - #142262 (Mark `core::slice::memchr` as `#[doc(hidden)]`) - #142271 (compiler: fn ptrs should hit different lints based on ABI) - #142288 (const_eval: fix some outdated comments) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #134442 (Specify the behavior of `file!`) - #140372 (Exhaustively handle parsed attributes in CheckAttr) - #140766 (Stabilize keylocker) - #141642 (Note the version and PR of removed features when using it) - #141818 (Don't create .msi installer for gnullvm hosts) - #141909 (Add central execution context to bootstrap) - #141992 (use `#[naked]` for `__rust_probestack`) - #142101 (core::ptr: deduplicate more method docs) - #142102 (docs: Small clarification on the usage of read_to_string and read_to_end trait methods) - #142124 (Allow transmute casts in pre-runtime-MIR) - #142240 (deduplicate the rest of AST walker functions) - #142258 (platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later) - #142262 (Mark `core::slice::memchr` as `#[doc(hidden)]`) - #142271 (compiler: fn ptrs should hit different lints based on ABI) - #142275 (rustdoc: Refractor `clean_ty_generics`) - #142288 (const_eval: fix some outdated comments) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Rollup merge of #142258 - teohhanhui:docs/platform-support-linux-kernel-version-or-later, r=workingjubilee platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later To be consistent with notes for other targets... ~~(Only made the change for `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` for now, as that's fairly certain after looking at the `git blame` just to be sure.)~~
tgross35
pushed a commit
to tgross35/compiler-builtins
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#134442 (Specify the behavior of `file!`) - rust-lang/rust#140372 (Exhaustively handle parsed attributes in CheckAttr) - rust-lang/rust#140766 (Stabilize keylocker) - rust-lang/rust#141642 (Note the version and PR of removed features when using it) - rust-lang/rust#141818 (Don't create .msi installer for gnullvm hosts) - rust-lang/rust#141909 (Add central execution context to bootstrap) - rust-lang/rust#141992 (use `#[naked]` for `__rust_probestack`) - rust-lang/rust#142101 (core::ptr: deduplicate more method docs) - rust-lang/rust#142102 (docs: Small clarification on the usage of read_to_string and read_to_end trait methods) - rust-lang/rust#142124 (Allow transmute casts in pre-runtime-MIR) - rust-lang/rust#142240 (deduplicate the rest of AST walker functions) - rust-lang/rust#142258 (platform-support.md: Mention specific Linux kernel version or later) - rust-lang/rust#142262 (Mark `core::slice::memchr` as `#[doc(hidden)]`) - rust-lang/rust#142271 (compiler: fn ptrs should hit different lints based on ABI) - rust-lang/rust#142275 (rustdoc: Refractor `clean_ty_generics`) - rust-lang/rust#142288 (const_eval: fix some outdated comments) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To be consistent with notes for other targets...
(Only made the change foraarch64-unknown-linux-gnufor now, as that's fairly certain after looking at thegit blamejust to be sure.)